NORTH BANTASKIN:
A FORGOTTEN FALKIRK ESTATE AND ITS OWNERS
Donald
E. Meek
For reasons that are not at all clear, the estate of
North Bantaskin has failed to be preserved as a prominent entry in the records
of Falkirk, and it is hardly noticed in present-day accounts of the history of
the burgh and its environs. Its
existence has to be pieced together by diligent examination of historical
sources, but that is no new problem to historians, who thrive on such
challenges. As often happens in such
circumstances, however, the evidence for furnishing a fresh interpretation and
a better understanding is much more plentiful than may appear at first sight,
and the availability of digitised records and internet search facilities turns
a potentially daunting task into a relatively straightforward operation.
The causes of the low profile of North Bantaskin seem
to derive, first, from its nature as an agricultural estate, which did not
contribute to the town’s burgeoning industry, based on coal and iron. In this it contrasts sharply with the estate
of South Bantaskine, lying on the other side of the Union Canal, which was
owned from 1828 by the coalmasters Robert Wilson and his son John, who succeeded
his father in 1836, and was famous for his ‘forty feet of daughters’. Because of its prominence as a coal-producing
area, and the preservation of part of the estate as a park, South Bantaskine
has featured conspicuously in recent writing about Falkirk, and is frequently
memorialised. Its prominence has also
worked to the detriment of North Bantaskin, which is regularly absorbed –
erroneously – into the lore surrounding South Bantaskine. Such confusion alone makes this fresh
examination and ‘disambiguation’ necessary.
The second reason for the disappearance of North
Bantaskin from the public mind is its gradual and progressive use for the
construction of new housing for the growing town. Pressure for new housing became acute in the
1930s, and continued after the Second World War. The erosion of the old estate and indeed its
submergence by new houses in both private and council sectors have all but
obliterated every trace of its former existence. In this respect, it was more vulnerable to
building than South Bantaskine, as the latter, because of mining, did not
provide firm ground, and developers were wary of its land.
Thanks to a copy of Raeburn's famous portrait of William 'Copperbottom' Forbes,
he stands above the mantelpiece in the Drawing Room of Callendar House.
A third, and more general, reason for the low profile
of North Bantaskin in the historiography of Falkirk is the tendency of
historians to focus – perhaps even to over-focus – on the Livingstons of
Callendar and their large and ‘central’ Callendar estate, as well as the town, while
making only the barest mention of any other Falkirk estates. The narrative of the greatness, decline and
fall of the Livingstons continues immediately with the arrival in 1783 of
William ‘Copperbottom’ Forbes, the industrialist-turned-landowner of Callendar,
to whom, as Baron, every knee bowed thereafter (sometimes reluctantly). This, however, did not mean the immediate end
of the Livingstons’ landholding elsewhere.
In fact, Bantaskine remained in parallel Livingston ownership until the
end of the eighteenth century, when Colonel Adam Livingston sold the estate to
Sir Alexander Campbell of Ardkinglas in 1791.
Reassigning of portions of Bantaskine to other owners
by feu is evident in the Livingston era. The conveyance of the estate by
purchase, with title, to single owners from Campbell onwards, however, together with the conveyance of other estates in the area, is the
crucial development which appears to have formalised, if not actually created,
the distinction between ‘North Bantaskin’ and ‘South Bantaskine’. Sale of estates in this period was hastened by
the impending insolvency of the original landlord, sometimes through excessive
spending on matters of lifestyle. The ‘new nobility’ who came to the rescue of
their impecunious predecessors were created by mercantile wealth. North Bantaskin was fated to come under the
control of nouveau-riche landlords through purchase in 1803, when it passed to
Charles Hagart. Twenty-five years were
to pass before South Bantaskine came into the hands of Robert Wilson, likewise
by purchase. In the case of North
Bantaskin, however, the new landlords were consistently merchants, and its most
prominent owners for a whole century, from 1803 to 1908, were successively West
India merchants, and not industrialists such as William Forbes, the coppersmith
in Callendar, and Robert Wilson, the coalmaster in South Bantaskine.
This process sets the development of the Bantaskine estate
firmly within the economic reconfiguration of Scotland from the later
eighteenth century, when both agricultural and industrial revolutions were in
progress, and trade with the West and East Indies was adding greatly to the
wealth of merchants, and transforming landholding accordingly. This wider context is nowhere better explained
than in T.M. Devine’s 2006 volume, Clearance
and Improvement: Land, Power and People in Scotland 1700-1900.
My own interest in what became North Bantaskin derives
from the final phase of the occupation of the estate mansion, namely Bantaskin
House, by the last of these West India merchants, James Wilson and his son
Robert, in the later nineteenth century and the early twentieth. In that period, three of my MacDonald
relatives from the island of Tiree were ‘in service’ with the Wilsons, and the
last surviving member of the family, my great-aunt Annabel MacDonald, in her
latter years often recalled her enduringly happy times ‘at Bantaskin’.
Annabel MacDonald as a young lady. |
Annabel’s sister, my grandmother Nancy
MacDonald, met and married James Meek, a master painter from Falkirk, at
Bantaskin House in 1899. The
arrangements for the wedding were made by Nancy’s brother, Alexander (‘Sandy’)
MacDonald, and the wedding invitations, with replies to ‘Bantaskin’, have
survived. Sandy married another of the
Bantaskin servants, Mary Fairlie from Killearn, and their descendants preserved
several fine portraits of members of the Wilson family, and also the only
surviving photograph of Bantaskin House
which shows it in context. For these
MacDonald and Fairlie servants, ‘Bantaskin’ was a place of immense kindness, ‘a
home from home’, where long-lasting relationships were forged – and one of
these contributed significantly to the making of this writer.
Remarkably too, for an estate which has disappeared
almost completely from public consciousness other than in the use of
‘Bantaskin’ in street names and the occasional reference to the town house of
the ‘Laird of Bantaskine’ in the High Street of Falkirk, its great mansion was
still standing as late as 1947, when thieves were caught red-handed stealing
six cwts of lead from its flat roof. The
dilapidation of the mansion, said to have been ‘unoccupied for some
considerable time’, was obviously under way, and it appears to have been
demolished by 1950 or thereabouts.
The
Livingston era
Bantaskin appears in writing in 1450 as
‘Pettintoscale’, a Brythonic/ Gaelic name, ‘Peit an t-soisgeil’, meaning ‘the
field of the gospel’, presumably a field set aside for maintaining (the
preaching of) the gospel. It was commonly written as ‘Pantaskin’ from about 1584
and ‘Bantaskin(e)’ from about 1687 (Reid 2009, p. 59). The house and lands of Bantaskine merited
some notice in general accounts and maps of the seventeenth and eighteenth
centuries. ‘Pantaske’ appears as a
place-name in Timothy Pont’s map of the Stirlingshire district, drawn between
1584 and 1613. In 1707, Sir Robert
Sibbald, in his History & Description
of Stirling-shire, Ancient and Modern, observed that ‘To the South of the
Town is Pantaskin, the Seat of a Gentleman of the Name of Livingston, of which
there are several others in this Shire’ (Calatria,
24, p. 70). In 1723 Alexander Johnston
of Kirkland (in the parish of Dunipace) wrote an account of the parish of
Falkirk, in which he made reference to the house: ‘A quarter of mile west of
Falkirk stands the house of Bantaskuie [sic – a misreading of minims] upon the
south side of Grahams dyke and half a mile west of Callander’ (Calatria, 32, p. 3).
This shows the Antonine Wall in what would have been the garden of
Bantaskin House, looking towards Camelon.
The powerful Livingston family of Scottish nobles,
descended from Sir Andrew de Livingston and pre-eminently associated with the
Callendar estate, owned the Bantaskine lands originally. The first bearer of the style ‘of Bantaskine’
in surviving inventories of writs is David Livingstone [sic, with –e in the
writs, followed in this paragraph] of Polmont, ‘thereafter of Bantaskine’, who
was granted an Instrument of Sasine on 31 May 1637 for ‘the Lands of
Bantaskine, called Wester Bantaskine’, ‘proceeding upon a charter from James
Lord Livingstone of Almond and Callander’.
He was succeeded by his son Alexander in 1644. Alexander was followed by his nephew Michael
in 1664. Through Michael Livingstone’s
daughters Isabel and Mary, who had no heirs, the estate passed in 1736 to Sir
James Livingstone of Glentirran, Michael Livingstone’s nephew and his daughter
Isabel’s ‘heir of provision’. Michael
Livingstone had earlier feued the ‘part of Bantaskine called Tophill and
Lymielands’ to Andrew Dick of Campstone (or Compston, in Muiravonside) and his
daughters Margaret and Anna in liferent in 1722. Dick was apparently a Writer to the Signet in
Falkirk, appearing as such on 11 January 1762.
He later feued the lands to John Benny, who then disponed them to
Alexander Adam, merchant in Falkirk. In
1757 Adam resigned the lands of Tophill and Lymielands to Sir James Livingston,
thus returning them to the estate.
In 1757 Sir James Livingston of Glentirran and
Bantaskine assigned the estate to Captain Adam Livingston (c. 1723-95) and
Captain John Livingston. Adam was Sir James’ second surviving son, by Helen,
daughter and heir of Sir James Campbell, M.P., of Ardkinglas, Argyll, a family
which later came to own Bantaskin briefly.
Livingston was a distinguished soldier in the Scots Fusiliers, and
served in Canada under Wolfe. He was
brought into Parliament as M.P. for Argyll in 1772 by John, 5th Duke of Argyll,
and relinquished the seat in 1780, in favour of Argyll’s brother Frederick (Namier
and Brooke).
On 19 October 1771 (transcript in FA: A001.096/08;
A1818.006), following his father’s death, Adam Livingston was confirmed by
James Earl of Errol (on behalf of the York Buildings Company, which
administered the forfeited Callendar estate) in liferent of the Bantaskine
estate, including Dick’s former lands, namely:
‘All and Whole the Said Sir James Livingston
his lands of Bantaskine with the pertinents lying in the Barony of Callendar
& the Sheriffdom of Stirling, as also all and heal that part of the lands
of Bantaskine called the Lyme Lands with ane piece of ground on the west end
thereof which were also acquired by the Said Andrew Dick, as also all and heal
that easter and wester meadows of Bantaskine, as also that sixteen shilling
eight penny land of the old town and lands of Falkirk with a cottace [sic] land
belonging thereto extending to a ten shilling land of old extent.’
In September 1790 notice was given that the
‘Policy and Parks of
Bantaskin consisting of about 66 Scots acres currently possessed by Colonel
Livingston himself are to be let and can be entered to at Martinmas 1790, being
all delightfully situated, and fit for the accommodation of a family wishing to
settle on a healthy spot hard by good markets, and roads leading to Edinburgh,
Glasgow, Stirling etc.
‘Whoever are inclined to
take feus or lets of any part of the premises may apply to John Burn, Writer,
Falkirk who will treat and transact with them…Application can also be made to
John Campbell, Writer to the Signet.’
In 1791 another advert appeared for what seem to be
additional lands for feuing or letting ‘all to be entered into at Martinmas
1791’. The 1791 advertisement defined
these lands as:
Bantaskin(e) Estate is positioned between the two canals, the Forth & Clyde ('Great Canal') to the north, and the Union Canal to the south. South Bantaskine is south of the Union Canal. |
‘It is proposed to feu
out grounds betwixt Camelon Villace [sic] and the Canal into such lots for
building a house or yard on each – also the parks be south the Canal, occupied
by Robert Walker and his subtenants in lots of one, two or three acres each –
and Wm Waugh’s farms in lots of five, eight or ten acres each…
Such of the lands as
shall not be taken off for feus will be let for nineteen years commencing from
the said term of Martinmas 1791.
Likewise the House,
Offices, Garden.’ (Transcripts in FA: A001.096/08)
This suggests that the estate had been divided into two
different parcels of land for feuing and letting, the 1790 parcel without the
‘House’, and the 1791 parcel with the ‘House’, lying close to the Forth &
Clyde Canal, or that Livingston finally decided to sell the entire estate.
Livingston’s desire to reassign the lands may explain why he commissioned a map
of ‘the lands of Bantaskin’ in 1790 from John Home, who drew up ‘A Plan of the
Lands of Bantaskin, belonging to Colonel Livingston’, which was hand-coloured
and linen-backed, with engraving by Kirkwood, Edinburgh. The estate plan shows ‘house, formal gardens,
meadows with boundaries, canal, post-road, Maggie Wood road, Soapree House,
Shiel Hill, and the lands of Arnot Hill noted’ (National Records of Scotland,
Repository code 234, reference RHP695). Adam Livingston certainly appears to
have been eager to be rid of the estate at this point. By 17 September 1791, acting with Captain
John Livingston, he had sold at least part of the estate to Sir Alexander
Campbell of Ardkinglas (d. 1810).
Dispositions continued into 1792. On 1 April 1793 Campbell conveyed the estate
(through James Ferrier WS) to Sir William Forbes of Pitsligo (1739-1806), a
wealthy banker and improver.
Sir William Forbes of Pitsligo (by Joshua Reynolds). |
‘Parks of Pantaskine or
Bantaskine called Wester Bantaskine and the lands of Tophill and Lymielands and
wester & easter Meadows of Bantaskine, viz. Mansion House of Bantaskine and
lands around the same, with a belt of planting and three parks to the west
thereof, consisting in all of 69 acres, 3 roods and 17 bolls and Teinds.’
Among the Bantaskin writs, there are no deeds relating to the estate known as South Bantaskine, which was owned from 1828 by Robert and John Wilson. However, land which is said to have formed a portion of the ‘the estate of Bantaskin sometime purchased by Sir William Forbes of Pitsligo’, namely the farm or ‘mailing’ of Newhouse of Bantaskine, was incorporated into South Bantaskine by disposition from James Rupel and Henry Arthur to John Wilson in 1836 (FA: EN 132/Wilson /7). This implies intervening transactions. ‘North’ Bantaskin, which is always ‘Bantaskine’ in the writs and in the family style (latterly without ‘-e’), was the principal estate, but it was evidently given the adjective ‘North’ as a geographical marker to distinguish it from its ‘new’ neighbour, which appears to have grown piecemeal as coal-bearing seams were discovered.
After a decade of financial and proprietorial
uncertainty at the end of traditional Livingston ownership, the purchase of North
Bantaskin by Charles Hagart put the estate on a very sound footing, ushering in
a century of remarkable stability, thanks to the immense fortunes made by Scottish
merchants in the West Indies.
The
Hagart era
Charles Hagart ‘of Bantaskine’, a Scot born in 1747, was
a very wealthy West India businessman with interests in trade and shipping,
based in the island of St Thomas. His wife
was Elizabeth Molineux, daughter of Philip Molineux, whose first husband was
John Heyliger, Governor of the Dutch-owned island of St Eustatius in the second
half of the eighteenth century (FA: A001.096/08). Charles Hagart died in September 1813, and his
wife in December 1820, and both were buried in Falkirk Parish Churchyard, where there may have been a family lair. A fragment of what is possibly Thomas
Hagart’s gravestone was sketched by Geoff
B. Bailey prior to its disposal along with other fragments in 2000 (Calatria, 26, p. 16, fragment from lair
58).
Thomas Campbell Hagart, son of Charles Hagart and Elizabeth Molineux, was born in St Thomas in 1784. On 23 August 1813 at Glasgow Field, Thomas, styled ‘younger of Bantaskine’, married Elizabeth Stewart ‘of the Field’, ‘a famous Glasgow beauty of her day’, who was born about 1783, and was the only daughter of Thomas Stewart of Westforth (Scots Magazine and Edinburgh Miscellany, Vol. 75, pt 2, p. 717; died July 1824, Blackwood’s Magazine, Vol. 18, p. 528). Her maternal uncle, James McCaul, known as ‘McCaul of Belvidere’, who owned a house in the vicinity of George Square, Glasgow (Somerville 1891, p. 17), was co-owner with James Bruce of the island estate of Belvedere, St Vincent, in the West Indies. McCaul (whose surname is spelt ‘McCall’ beyond the family, which consistently uses ‘McCaul’) purchased an estate called ‘Belvidere’, a couple of miles outside Glasgow, in 1798. Upon McCaul’s death, under his will of 1823, Elizabeth Hagart inherited his Belvedere, St Vincent, estate as residuary legatee (Summary of Individual Legacies of British Slave-ownership). This was a sugar plantation run by slaves. In 1834 compensation of £5,310 10s 3d was paid to Elizabeth Hagart as ‘owner-in-fee’ (St Vincent 501) for emancipation. The number of slaves on her Belvedere estate was 199 in 1824, but it had fallen to 184 by 1834, as the records of slave-owning estates show (below).
Thomas C. Hagart and his wife appear to have been
resident in Scotland by at least 1819, when their second daughter, Ann
Elizabeth Molineux, was born in Edinburgh.
They were living at Bantaskin by 1824, and ‘well set up’ by inherited
wealth, with a sugar-growing estate in St Vincent, Westforth estate in
Lanarkshire, and a country estate near Falkirk. Thomas Hagart was granted
heraldic arms in 1824 (Seton 1863, p. 129), a sign of his ‘arrival to landed
power’ sometimes sought by the new ‘merchant aristocracy’ (Devine 2006, p.
68). The escutcheon granted to Hagart has
entered heraldic history as it was ‘somewhat curious’ in its ‘extension of the
“matrimonial allusion”’, because ‘in the second and third quarters we find the
bearings of the family of McCaul “as a mark of regard and affection for the
memory of the patentee’s wife’s maternal uncle of that name”!’ (Seton 1863, p.
129). In 1824, Hagart became a member of
the Royal Highland and Agricultural Society of Scotland.
The Hagarts had two sons, Charles, born in 1814, and
James McCaul, born in 1817. Both became distinguished officers in the British
army, entering the 7th Hussars as cornets in 1832 and 1837 respectively. Both were in India, in service with the 7th
Hussars, and both held command of the regiment.
In the Valuation Roll for 1865, they each owned half of the three fields
of North Bantaskin, while their father owned the house and gardens. Lieut
Colonel James McCaul Hagart CB’s address was then said to be ‘Belevedere St
Vincent, West Indies’, while that of his brother Colonel Charles Hagart CB was
‘Commandant Cavalry Depot, Maidstone, Kent’.
One photograph exists showing Colonel James McCaul Hagart dressed rather
eccentrically in non-military attire, while undertaking his military duties in
India (Hagart brothers’ military service). Both were soldiers of exceptional bravery, as
recognised by their CBs, and James was actually recommended for a VC by Sir
Hope Grant for his gallantry at Lucknow.
A memorial cross to both brothers was erected in Camelon Cemetery,
Falkirk.
A memorial to the Hagart brothers stands in Camelon Cemetery, Falkirk. From the Scottish War Graves website. |
It is certainly clear that Thomas C. Hagart was an
extremely rich man. When he died in 1868
in a house which he owned at 47 Eversfield Place, St Leonards-on-Sea, Sussex, his
will shows that his personal estate alone in the United Kingdom came to some
£78,243. Major General (formerly Colonel) Charles Hagart, as the elder son and
educated at Eton, inherited the Bantaskin estate. Upon his retirement on 12
November 1858, his younger brother Lieut Colonel James McCaul Hagart was given
the estate of Belvedere, St Vincent, by his mother, and that explains his
presence there in 1865.
Mrs Elizabeth Hagart died at Weston-super-Mare in
October 1869. As her will shows, she was
a very wealthy woman in her own right, leaving personal estate worth £47,421 in
the United Kingdom, including consolidated stock (£3,400) in the Forth and
Clyde Navigation Company, and debenture stock (£2,400) in the Scottish Central
Railway Company (Caledonian Railway).
She was also firmly independent, as she did not give her St Vincent
estate to her husband, nor did they hold it jointly, as she was evidently very loyal
to her McCaul benefactor and his name, while maintaining her interest in her
father’s Scottish estate of Westforth. She
also ‘part bought commissions in the army’ for James, and, in her will, she
states that her not giving him a larger share is explained by her earlier gift
of the Belvedere estate, her army purchases and provisions by her late
husband.
Eastbury Manor, Compton, Guildford, Surrey, is now a Grade II Listed Building, and a BUPA Care Home. |
When Charles Hagart and James McCaul Hagart died,
Charles in 1879 and James in 1894, their respective personal estates amounted
to £100,000 and £118,000. At the time of
his death, Charles was living in Eastbury Manor, near Guildford, Surrey, but
his will makes no mention of Bantaskin estate, being concerned to bequeath his
Surrey home to his sister, Ann Elizabeth Molineux Hagart, who, presumably, had
continued to live in Bantaskin House, or took to do with it, until it was sold.
Thereafter she went to live at Eastbury
Manor until her own death in 1895. At
the time of his death, James was living at 13 Queen Street, Mayfair, and, by
means of an instrument under French law, had disposed of an estate,
‘Barbiccagia, in the Commune of Ajaccio’, in Corsica, ‘in favour of my niece
Eliza Alexander’ (wife of General Sir Claud Alexander of Ballochmyle) prior to
making his will in 1889. No mention is
made of Belvedere, St Vincent, which was presumably sold at an earlier date,
and the proceeds invested in Barbiccagia. No wives or immediate family, other than the
Hagart sisters, Eliza and Ann, are mentioned in either will.
Barbicaggia, Ajaccio, Corsica, as it is today. |
James’ remaining sister and the last of the Hagarts,
Eliza Stewart Ellice (formerly Speirs) of Invergarry, died at Eastbury Manor in
December 1910, as the confirmation of her will indicates. Edward Ellice (1810-80), her second husband
whom she married as his second wife in 1867, was the son of Edward ‘Bear’
Ellice (1783-1863), who bought the Glengarry estate in 1839. The Ellices
(probably Edward jnr) bought Glenquoich in 1863. Edward jnr was a Liberal M.P. for St Andrews Burghs for 42
years. Both Eliza and her husband undertook building projects in the area. Eliza is credited with the building of Invergarry Hotel in 1885, the parish church in 1864,
the school in 1868 and other houses in the village (Ardochy
House Cottages).
Elizabeth Stewart (Hagart) Ellice, formerly Speirs, is buried at Tornacarry, Invergarry. Image from Find a Grave, uploaded by Jim Hunt. |
All in all, the Hagarts were very much a ‘county
family’, and regarded as such in their own time, being afforded notices in the
‘class journals’ of their era, and reckoned among ‘the top ten thousand’ in the
United Kingdom. Mrs Hagart was able to
discuss the prospects of James McCaul Hagart with no less a person than William
Ewart Gladstone. Gladstone notes in his
diary: ‘Hagarts breakfasted with me — very nice boys. Fr. reading as yesterday — billiards with
Miss Hagart — long conv. with Mrs H. on her son's prospects (Js)’ (Foote
1968). Thomas
Hagart was also noticed in the publications of the Freemasons, and he was a
Knight Commander of the Order of the Knights Templars (Statutes of the Religious and Military Order of the Temple 1843, p.
34). So far, however, there is no
evidence of any significant philanthropy on his part, though in later years his
son General Charles Hagart maintained the family’s Falkirk connection by
contibuting to the fund for coal for ‘the poor’. Two letters by Thomas Hagart to William
Forbes MP of Callendar, written in January 1835 and January 1836 respectively,
show routine concerns, the first confirming the landholding status of his son
Charles for voting purposes, and the second requesting a day’s shooting at
Callendar for Charles and two friends (FA: A727.1230 (1), A727.1231 (8)), a
courtesy which can be traced back to the days of the first Charles Hagart at
Bantaskin, who wrote similarly in 1804 to ‘Copperbottom’ Forbes, father of
William Forbes, MP.
The Hagarts thus fit firmly into the pattern of the very
many enterprising, business-minded and hard-nosed Scots of the later eighteenth
century and the early nineteenth, who went to the West Indies, and, through
trade, transport and industry (in the form of slave-owning, sugar-growing
estates like Belvedere, St Vincent), made immense fortunes which allowed them
to become an integral part of the new ‘landed gentry’ with an abundance of
‘landed security’. Money, rather than
title, gave them land and status and access to the ranks of high society, which
they obviously craved. Eliza Stewart
Hagart, the eldest and longest-surviving daughter, married well, first into the
Speirs of Elderslie, West India tobacco merchants, and then into the Ellices,
the owners of Glengarry and Glenquoich. Her daughter continued to climb the grand
ladder. At the same time, the Hagarts contributed, through their sons, to
British imperial power, particularly in India.
This extract from a map of 1865 shows Bantaskin(e) House and gardens, with Maggie Wood's Loan on the right. |
A couple of fascinating snapshots of Bantaskin House and its occupiers have survived from the days of the Hagarts. In the New Statistical Account of 1834-45, the house and grounds are described as follows:
‘Bantaskine House, the residence of T.C.
Haggart [sic] Esq., is an elegant and substantial mansion of modern
architecture. It stands on an elevated
spot, half a mile south-west of the town, and partakes of the fine prospect
which has already been adverted to. The
grounds are encircled by luxuriant plantations.’
In the 1851 Census, we find that the house and estate
were maintained by no less than twelve servants, comprising coachman, footman,
groom, butler, laundrymaid, kitchenmaid, cook, ladysmaid, dairymaid, head
gardner and two gardners.
This certainly squares with the dimensions of the
house itself and the acreage of the estate.
These were described in 1911, when Bantaskin was put on the market, as
follows:
‘The Mansion House and
Estate of Bantaskin, situated to the West of Falkirk. The Grounds extend to about 89 acres.
‘The Mansion House
consists of Three Storeys, and consists of Entrance Hall, and Lounge,
Dining-Room, Drawing-Room, Parlour, Library, Boudoir, Billiard-Room,
Cloak-Room, 8 Bedrooms, Dressing-Room, 2 Bathrooms, 3 Servants’ Bedrooms, Servants’
Parlour, Kitchen, and other accommodation, including Wine Cellar and the usual
Offices; also Entrance Lodge, stabling etc.
‘The Flower and Vegetable
Gardens, which are walled in, extend to about 2½ acres, and contain Three Large
Vineries, Pear-House and Orchid-Houses.
‘The Mansion House is
surrounded by Shrubberies, and Lawns (including Tennis and Croquet Lawns), and
the remainder of the ground is in pasture.’
We may well surmise that Bantaskin House was greatly
enhanced by Thomas Hagart, but there is no evidence so far for the date of
building or for any reconstruction. The
only surviving photograph showing the front of the mansion demonstrates that it
was of a relatively unadorned Classical style, with a portico and columns, not
unlike the frontage of Elderslie House, built to a Robert Adam design in 1782.
Elderslie House (demolished 1920). |
Remarkably, as if to affirm and complement the
photograph, we have a description of the approach to Bantaskin House, written
about 1880 by the author of The History
of Stirlingshire, who wanted to give the reader some impression of the
‘elegant mansions and villas’ in this part of Falkirk:
‘Bantaskine too has its
own peculiar attractions. Delightful is
the walk along the avenue to the mansion.
Among the ornamental trees, thick and umbrageous, are magnificent
specimens of the chestnut, plane and larch.
Three years ago, this old estate, than which a finer, for its extent,
lies not within the bounds of Scotland, was purchased from General Haggart
[sic] by Mr. Alexander McLean of Glasgow; but last year it became the property
of Provost Wilson of Govan. Near the
house – externally a plain, yet substantial edifice – there is an old yew which
measures 70 yards in circumference.’
Mr. Alexander McLean was a banker with the Bank of
Scotland, Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, and the estate was purchased on his
behalf for £14,000 by his brother Robert McLean, Writer, Hillhead (FA:
A001.096/08). It may be of significance
that James Wilson, in his will, indicates that he bought the estate from a
Chartered Accountant (‘acquired by me under Disposition by Robert Reid
Chartered Accountant in Glasgow’). This
may suggest that McLean had run into financial difficulties.
The
Wilson era
When Provost James Wilson of Govan purchased the
estate of Bantaskin in 1879, he was within a year of completing his third term
as Provost of the burgh. As he had been
very effective in his duties, and honoured with regular dinners and
accompanying speeches of appreciation (as, for example, in 1876 and 1877), he
was offered a fourth term in office, which he refused.
A contemporary cartoon of James Wilson as Provost of Govan. |
Retirement from a very challenging role,
which he had fulfilled with distinction from 1872 to 1880, now beckoned, and in
1881 he moved from his home in Govan to his new Falkirk estate. James Wilson’s deep commitment to civic affairs
involving ‘ordinary’ people stands as something of a contrast to the
class-bound aspirations and circles of
Thomas Hagart. It is therefore
fascinating to note that, in spite of their very different perspectives, James
Wilson too was a West India merchant.
James was born in 1823 in Edinburgh, and not Maryhill,
as claimed in his obituary in the Falkirk Herald (FH, 28 May 1904). He was the son of Robert Wilson and Margaret
Jackson, whose banns were called at Glencorse, Midlothian, on 12 April 1822. According to his obituary, which is not always
reliable on important points of detail, James Wilson’s family appears to have
moved to the Glasgow area, and to have been located in Jordanhill and
Scotstoun, and also Paisley. In 1842 he
was apprenticed to Messrs John Taylor, jun., & Co., West India merchants,
who had premises in Cochrane Street. He
went to Trinidad in 1845 to manage the firm’s branch house, evidently in Port
of Spain. A year later, with the
resignation of the younger John Taylor, he became a partner with Mr Taylor,
senior, and for a period the firm was known as ‘Taylor and Wilson’. This was a standard career-track for young
Scottish merchants in Trinidad, as Bridget Brereton (1979, p. 51) has noted:
‘The Scots, though
relatively few in numbers, were an extremely influential commercial group,
dominating the “dry goods” business, the larger stores dealing in everything
except food. Scottish merchants sent out
young men to Trinidad to work as shop assistants or clerks, often in stores
owned by relatives in Trinidad or by Scottish firms. If they were industrious they would, after a
few years, set up businesses themselves, or be admitted as partners to
established Scottish merchants.’
In 1846, too, at Port of Spain James Wilson married
his boss’s daughter, Agnes, in the small Baptist church where the Rev. John Law
had only recently arrived from England under the auspices of the Baptist
Missionary Society.
Mrs Agnes Wilson with baby Edwin Connell Wilson. |
This was to be a
‘good career move’, as such marriages usually were, as he came to own the firm,
and eventually it became James Wilson, Son & Co. and James Wilson &
Sons, as his sons were admitted as partners.
Its business was conducted from Glasgow, variously at 166 Buchanan
Street, and 38 West George Street.
James Wilson in his middle years with top hat! |
Wilson & Sons are described in the obituary as
‘merchants and planters’, in sugar and cocoa, ‘in a large way of
business’. Wilson’s will (FH, June 1904)
shows that he had interests in ‘several shipping concerns’, among them the
Trinidad Shipping and Trading Company, and that he was also involved in the
Scottish Employees’ Liability and General Insurance Company (Limited). The total value of his estate at the time of
his death was £153,563 – a very substantial amount of wealth, directly comparable
with that of the Hagarts.
Wilson returned to Scotland as ‘home partner’ in 1859,
and appears to have built a substantial house at 595 Paisley Road West, Govan,
which was known as ‘Trinidad Villa’, and where he and his family were resident
from at least 1867-68 (Glasgow Street
Directory), with three servants in 1871 as listed in the Census for that
year, namely Janet Fairlie (41, from Killearn), Margaret McIntyre (35, from
Kilbrandon) and Sophia McReddie (27, from Ferintosh or Tain). Janet Fairlie remained with the family
throughout her active life, and appears to have been instrumental in
introducing her nieces, Janet and Mary, to Bantaskin House. Mary was later to marry my great-uncle Sandy
MacDonald from Caolas, Tiree, and the Fairlies were to become, and remain,
friends of the MacDonald and Meek families to the present day.
Having moved from Govan, Wilson lost no time in
improving his new estate. The third
edition of Nimmo’s History of
Stirlingshire informs us:
‘North Bantaskine (James Wilson, Esq.,) is
fully entitled to a place of some consideration among the notable estates of
Stirlingshire. The grounds contain some of the finest specimens of the yew,
larch, plane, and chestnut in the county, together with a fine fragment of the
Roman wall. The lawn in front of the mansion is in beautiful condition, and the
garden and green-houses are also in a very perfect state. Mr. Wilson, who only
became proprietor of the place about two years ago, has not only enlarged, but
greatly improved his residence.’
James Wilson’s sons, Robert, James, Edwin and Gilbert,
moved between Scotland and Trinidad, and acted as the firm’s representatives
overseas. The most prominent of these was Robert, the eldest, who went to
Trinidad at the age of nineteen, and later became the owner of the Mayfield
estate, Falkirk, immediately to the east of Bantaskin. In 1891 he was resident in Mayfield House,
with his wife Charlotte Lydia Ross, and his eight children, together with no
less than six domestic servants. Both
Robert and Charlotte, and several of their children, were born in the ‘Trinidad
British Colony’. After his father’s
death in 1904, Robert moved to Bantaskin House, and remained there until his own
untimely death in 1908.
Mayfield House, the residence of Robert Wilson. |
This would appear to be no exaggeration. The Wilsons seem to have enjoyed a close and
happy relationship with Creole people.
In fact, James Wilson, junior, married ‘Marion, elder daughter of the
Hon. Julian H. Archer’ in All Saints Church, Port of Spain, Trinidad, on 14
November 1900. The Archers were a very prominent
Trinidadian English Creole family with mercantile interests, among others. A very fine photograph of a beautiful
coloured lady has survived among my family’s Bantaskin photographs, and this is
almost certainly Marion Archer Wilson, who, though coloured, would have been
English-speaking. The 1901 Census
records that Marion and James were at Bantaskin House in that year, and it is
highly likely that the photograph was given to Mary Fairlie as a special
keepsake of the occasion.
This may be Mrs Marion Wilson (nee Archer), wife of James Wilson jnr. |
The 1901 Census also shows that the house was maintained by five domestic servants, Ellen Wilson (44) from Ayrshire, Mary Fairlie (32) from Killearn, Flora MacKinnon (28) from Tobermory, Christina MacLean (32) from Tiree, and my great-aunt Annabel MacDonald (22) from Tiree. Mary Fairlie’s sister Janet was also there, probably in the 1890s. We know too that my great-uncle Alexander (‘Sandy’) and my grandmother Nancy were both at Bantaskin in 1899, when Sandy issued the invitations to attend the marriage of Nancy to my grandfather James Meek on Friday 2nd June 1899. The instruction at the foot of the card read simply: ‘Reply to BANTASKIN, FALKIRK’. No more was needed, and no place could have been more appropriate for the event.
James Wilson in pensive mood at his desk. |
This is all of a piece with the broader perspectives
of the Wilson family, which combined a concern for people of all classes with a
kind-hearted philanthropy, the evidence of which has outlasted Bantaskin House,
and extended beyond his home and business. In December 1875, for example, ‘Provost
Wilson, in the presence of a large number of spectators’, laid the ‘memorial
stone’ of Govan’s new Baptist church, and gave a speech which showed his
knowledge of, and deep commitment to, Baptist witness in Govan and Glasgow (GH,
6 December 1875). His Baptist commitment, however, is seen pre-eminently afteer
1880 in the gathering and building of Falkirk Baptist Church, of which he and
his son Robert were members and office-bearers.
James Wilson met half the costs of the original ‘tin kirk’ in Melville
Street, and also of the 1897 building in Weir Street, which is used to the
present day (Polland 1999, pp. 8-25).
Memorial window to Mrs Agnes Wilson and Mrs Charlotte Wilson in Falkirk Baptist Church. |
Appropriately, the church contains two fine
stained-glass windows in memory of members of the Wilson family. Above the pulpit, in the south gable, stands
a particularly poignant window which was installed in 1897 by James Wilson in
memory of his own wife, Agnes, and his daughter-in-law, Charlotte Lydia,
Robert’s wife. Both ladies died
tragically and unexpectedly within months of each other in 1892, Agnes in
February, and Charlotte Lydia in May. In
1905 Robert, ‘a veritable tower of strength’ and a Deacon of the church,
installed a fine window in memory of his father, James Wilson, in the north
gable. This adds a colourful and
warm-hearted touch of ‘class’ to what continues to be a fine building, but,
above all, it bears eloquent witness to the generous, supportive and close-knit
nature of the family of the Wilsons of Govan and Bantaskin.
Memorial window to James Wilson, Falkirk Baptist Church. |
James Wilson was generous with his skills, time and
money in other areas of Falkirk life. He
was an Honorary President of the local YMCA.
More signficantly, he was a staunch Liberal, and very active in the
politics of Stirlingshire, helping the Home-Rule candidate to a major political
triumph in a difficult contest in 1886, and acting as the first President of
Falkirk Liberal Club. His last public
appearance on the platform, when he was in failing health, was met with such
adulation that he was overcome with emotion and unable to speak. According to
his obituary, ‘He always kept himself in touch with every section of the party,
from the head down to the poorest member, showing quite as much respect for the
one as for the other’.
That is fair comment, it would seem, and it explains
fully why, when my Aunt Annabel reached her own last years in ‘Coll View’,
Caolas, Tiree, in the late 1960s, nothing pleased her more than to recall, with
a broad smile, the many kindnesses she had known, and the many friendships she
had made, in Bantaskin House, the home of James Wilson and his family, a
millionaire in today’s terms, but a man whose warm ‘embrace’ reached even the
hearts of his servants.
Hagart,
Wilson and the merchant aristocracy
James Wilson was born in 1823, about the same time as
Thomas Hagart became a recognised landowner on Bantaskin estate. Both men were separated by a generation, and
much had changed in that period. Hagart
and his father were at the height of their careers before emancipation in 1833,
and would have been slave-owners, as Elizabeth Stewart Hagart certainly was on
her inherited Belvedere estate, while Wilson was active after 1840, and would
not have owned slaves. Emancipation may
have changed such men’s perspectives not only on the relationship between a
wealthy merchant and his workers, but also on their relationship to the world
beyond their immediate circles.
It is certainly evident that, in terms of social
attitudes and aspirations, the two men were very different, although they
shared very similar business contexts. When
he settled at Bantaskin, Hagart acquired all the signs of the ‘arrived’ landed
potentate, including heraldic arms and membership of the Royal Highland and
Agricultural Society of Scotland. His
own marriage and those of his daughters were high-class ‘world events’, and the
family moved in the ‘right’ circles, with an eye to continuing advancement. His sons became distinguished soldiers of
Empire, and their promotion was a matter of concern to Mrs Hagart in her
conversations with Gladstone. In short, the Hagarts used their status as
wealthy landowners to exploit the social and political prestige which such
status bestowed. Their perspectives also
seem to have been directed towards the corridors of power within the British
Empire, and specifically in the south of England, where all the main members of
the family – father, mother and all four of their surviving children – were
latterly resident.
Wilson shared with Hagart the ultimate earthly
ambition of those who accumulated wealth through commerce, namely to become
‘landed proprietors’, whose status was recognised not by lineage and inherited
title, but by their ‘self-made’ achievements, crowned with the ownership of an
estate. Wilson, however, reached his
goal much later in life than Hagart, and there is no evidence that he sought
badges of power to affirm his presence among the landed aristocracy.
Both Hagart and Wilson operated within the networks
provided by the West India merchants of Glasgow and their associates. Both married within the group, Hagart into the Stewarts of Glasgow
Field and Westforth, and Wilson into the Taylors of Glasgow, with whom he
served his apprenticeship. Their
offspring did likewise. Hagart’s
daughter Eliza married into the wealthy Speirs merchant family of Elderslie,
and Robert, James Wilson’s son, married Charlotte Lydia Ross, whose father John
Ross was also a West India merchant. His
second son James married into the prestigious Trinidad family of the Hon.
Julian H. Archer, which had strong mercantile interests.
Beyond merchant circles, however, Wilson’s worldview
was shaped by his own roots, which did not lie, as far as we can judge, within
an already wealthy kindred. He had risen
from much more lowly circles than Hagart, with no pre-existing West India
connection. He had no ‘paternal acres’ to inherit, and they were clearly not
his first, or even his second, priority.
Civic service called more loudly. His long tenure of office as Provost of Govan
from 1872 to 1880 sets him apart from the Hagarts, but places him firmly within
the Glasgow West India merchant circle, which provided several Provosts of
Glasgow. Like these merchants, James Wilson operated in the ‘outside’ community
as a man of influence, and exercised political leadership for the wider good of
society and of many much less fortunate than himself, namely the working class
of Govan in an era of rapid industrial expansion. It is telling that he identified with Govan to
the end of his days, and that he and his son Robert were buried in the family
vault in Craigton Cemetery.
In addition, Wilson’s values were nurtured by his evangelical
Christian faith within the Baptist denomination, which had a strong connection
with working-class people, while depending to some considerable extent on the
generosity of wealthy men and, to a lesser degree, women, to fund their
outreach and to support the building of premises. Evangelical Christians were to be found among
Glasgow’s West India merchants, but they were usually within the Presbyterian
fold, and most joined the Free Church in 1843.
Wilson was unusual in being a Baptist.
In addition to his support for the local Baptist cause, he contributed to the life and politics of
Falkirk and Stirlingshire. In these ways,
he seems to have been less self-seeking, and more altruistic, than Thomas C.
Hagart. Hagart’s gaze was upwards to
prestige, while Wilson’s was downwards to the wider social good.
It is noteworthy too that the Wilsons’ West India
interests lasted much longer than the Hagarts’. Thomas Hagart’s sons became
high-ranking officers in the British Army, and their business interests
declined accordingly. They appear to
have lost interest in Bantaskin House and estate after their father’s death, if
not long before. James Wilson’s business was passed to his
sons, who likewise made Scotland their base, and then to his grandsons,
employing much the same principles as Wilson himself had done, with family
members acting at home or in Trinidad as required. His sons, Gilbert Taylor Wilson and Edwin
Connell Wilson, each designated ‘West India merchant (Retired)’ on their death
certificates, were latterly based in the west of Scotland, the former dying at
4 Bute Mansions, Glasgow, in 1928, and the latter normally resident at Luss
Hotel, Luss, at the time of his death in 1948.
His grandson (Robert’s son), John Ross Wilson, was designated a West
India merchant at the time of his father’s death in 1908, and his son James
died in Trinidad in 1915, shortly after enlisting in the 1st Merchants’
Contingent, with a view to service in the First World War. Three of Robert’s sons – James, John Ross and
Tom Taylor – attended Glasgow University for a year each in the late nineteenth
century and the early twentieth (University of Glasgow Story).
Decline
and decay
Although the Wilsons’ firm and certainly their West
India interests appear to have survived well into the twentieth century, the
family’s connection with Bantaskin House seems to have weakened both speedily
and substantially after Robert’s death in 1908. The house and estate were put
on the market in 1911, for an upset price of £17,000. By 1914 it was still unsold, and it was
re-advertised at an upset price of £10,000.
The drop in value reflects the economic downturn which affected Falkirk
at that time, and foreshadows the effect of the First World War on the local
and national economy.
However, the papers of James Love contain remarkable
evidence that a group of Falkirk citizens was considering buying Bantaskin
House and estate for the town at precisely this point. The evidence consists of a pamphlet, marked
‘PRIVATE’, with the title, ‘Proposed Purchase of Bantaskin’, and dated
‘Falkirk, 16th January 1914’ (FA: A001.096/09).
The first paragraph reads:
‘In response to a
widespread desire that some effort should be made by the Citizens of Falkirk to
buy the Mansion House and Estate of North Bantaskin, Falkirk, a public meeting
was held in Mathieson’s Rooms, Falkirk, on 8th inst. At that Meeting those
present unanimously resolved to endeavour to form a Limited Liability Company,
for the purpose of raising funds to acquire the same for recreative and other
purposes.’
The pamphlet goes on to describe the house and estate,
as summarised in the advertisements, but it also examines the potential of the
estate, with a Report by John Duncan, the Professional of the Stirling Golf
Club, who opined that ‘The turf is exceptionally good and little work would be
required in making the greens’. The
proposal was that the company should raise a capital of £12,000 on the basis of
shareholding. What is described as ‘a
feasible scheme’ for maintaining the property is then outlined, with estimates
of Income and Expenditure (presumably for a single year), without taking into
account the Minerals and other potential sources of revenue. The writer of the pamphlet was at pains to
point out that the grounds would ‘not be any more private than they are now’,
and not retstricted to ‘Golf, Tennis, Bowling etc.’ A form was enclosed for those interested in
taking shares to indicate their willingness to do so, and to what extent. A Prospectus would then be issued, inviting
people to subscribe ‘the necessary Capital’.
The pamplet was signed by James Muirhead, Convener of the Committee
(formed at the meeting of 8th January), and by A. & J. C. Allan & Co.,
Solicitors.
This document foreshadows what, a century later, would
have been a fairly standard procedure for rescuing and developing a facility
deemed to be of value to a town. A similar process would have been put into
effect when Callendar House, for example, was bought and restored. There is, however, no evidence that the
proposal for Bantaskin House and Estate went much further. The downturn caused by the war probably
dampened enthusiasm and reduced potential funds.
The advertisements of 1911 and 1914 emphasise the
‘imminent Feuing Value’ of the estate, and, with the 1914 proposal apparently
in abeyance, it would seem that Bantaskin Estate was gradually feued out. This appears to have caused difficulties
when, in September 1937, Falkirk Town Council ‘abandoned’ an attempt to acquire
some ground. The Council had received
advice from the Secretary of the Department of Health for Scotland ‘with
reference to the proposal to acquire a site at North Bantaskin for housing
purposes’. The Chief Valuer, in an
enclosed copy of a letter, had intimated ‘that practically all the available
frontages of Bantaskin have been feued, the extent being 25 acres, and asking
in view of this if the Town Council wish to reconsider their decision to
acquire the ground’ (FH, 25 September 1937).
The Town Council duly reconsidered.
However, the Council was able to acquire ground from Bantaskin Estate
for the building of Falkirk High School and council houses to the south of what
is now Westburn Avenue, where the area preserves the name of Bantaskin in its
street nomenclature.
Presumably members of the Wilson family were still
active in estate affairs as proprietors, at least in matters pertaining to private
feuing, but it would seem that none lived at Bantaskin House for any
substantial part of the twentieth century, though this requires further
investigation. On Robert’s death in
1908, the house would have passed to his sons who had already made their own arrangements,
and would not have wished to encumber themselves with a large mansion,
requiring costly maintenance. His brothers likewise would have been
self-sufficient in this regard. Grandeur
was no longer an essential part of the successful West India merchant’s
trademark.
Gradually, over some forty years, the house decayed
until, in 1947, lead was being stolen from the roof (FH, 8 October 1947). It
was probably demolished soon thereafter. It is little short of remarkable that it
lasted as long as it did, and this may be an indication that the town was, on
the whole, unwilling to part with it, and living in hope that a buyer would
appear. This did not happen. The ground that was not feued for private
housing was feued or rented out for farming, and individuals brought up in the
area in the 1950s still remember the piggeries on the west side, between Frobisher
Avenue and Anson Avenue, while others from an earlier generation remember the
stables.
No physical trace of the house itself now remains, but
study of available maps of Falkirk from the mid-nineteenth century, and a
survey of the area, show that it was located at a point where a line drawn due
south from Rosebank Distillery intersects with the line of the Antonine
Wall. This places the site of Bantaskin
House more or less in the middle of what is now Frobisher Avenue. The main driveway to the house, shown in the
photograph, corresponds roughly to the route of Queen’s Drive, which leads off
Maggie Wood’s Loan. The Loan marked the
eastern boundary of the estate as it would have been in the second half of the
nineteenth century.
On the other side of
Maggie Wood’s Loan was Mayfield Estate, formerly owned by Robert, James
Wilson’s son. He lived in Mayfield House
from the 1860s, a fine Italianate mansion built for Provost John Russel, which
still stands proudly as the last building associated with the Wilson family.
When he became owner of Bantaskin Estate after his father’s death in 1904, and
moved into the ‘big house’, Robert had only to cross Maggie Wood’s Loan.
Mayfield House alone bears witness to the style and
grandeur formerly enjoyed by those wealthy West India merchants, the Hagarts
and the Wilsons, in their ‘retirement years’ in Falkirk. Like the Hagart family before it, the Wilson
family vanished during the first half of the twentieth century. Its status was built on money, and the family
had no name or title or lineage to preserve its memory in public, beyond the
stained-glass windows in Falkirk Baptist Church and obituaries and notices in
the columns of newspapers. By 1950 too,
Bantaskin House had been reduced to rubble, and lived only in the memory of its
former servants.
James
Wilson
In his will of 1894 (SC67/40/6 Stirling Sheriff Court
Wills), James Wilson mentions several members of his wider family, and one
member of his immediate family. These
may be of interest to distant relatives researching family history (with
punctuation regularised):
(1) ‘Isabella Taylor, daughter of my sister-in-law Mrs
Isabella Taylor, presently residing at Shawlands’;
(2) ‘my four sisters-in-law Sophia, Georgina, Mary and
Jemima Taylor’;
(3) ‘my brother-in-law, William Taylor’;
(4) ‘my niece, Margaret White, now Mitchell, residing at
Portland Place, Hamilton’;
(5) ‘my nieces, Catherine Taylor or Renison, wife of
William Renison, Junior…Amelia Taylor and Jessie Taylor or McLeod, wife of
Donald McLeod, presently residing at Bearsden’;
(6) ‘my female cousins, daughters of my late Uncle James
Cowan, late Gardener at Holyrood’;
(7) ‘Margaret Golder, daughter of my deceased sister Mrs
Elizabeth Wilson or Golder’
(8) ‘Mrs William McKay residing at Stromness’;
(9) ‘Mrs Martha Wilson or Allan, my sister’;
(10) ‘my sister-in-law Mrs Margaret Taylor or Park,
presently residing at Royal Street, Gourock’;
(11) ‘my daughter Agnes Wilson, now Sturrock, [recently married]
to John Frederick Sturrock, Doctor of Medicine, Broughty Ferry’.
[Agnes Sturrock died at ‘Arina’, Brook Street,
Broughty Ferry, on 26 June 1906, aged 42.
Her husband died at the same address, aged 54, in February 1916, and his
death was registered by his daughter Isabel Sturrock.]
In the 1891 Census, the children of Robert Wilson, son
of James Wilson, are listed as follows: James (18) art student, John R. (14)
scholar, Agnes T. (11) scholar, Tom T. (9) scholar, Robert (6) scholar, Cecil
G. (3) scholar, Gladys M. (2), Dorothy (7 months). The first two, and also Tom T., were born in
Trinidad British Colony; Agnes T. was born in Govan, and the four youngest were
born in Falkirk.
DEDICATION
The present account, which rescues Bantaskin and its
owners from obscurity, owes its existence to the recollections of my great-aunt
Annabel MacDonald, a former domestic servant at Bantaskin House, to whom it is
dedicated with deep gratitude for, and in warm and affectionate remembrance of,
a wonderful lady who spent her last years at home in ‘Coll View’, Caolas, Isle
of Tiree. She was Bantaskin’s finest ambassador.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
In addition to my debt to my Tiree relatives, I deeply
indebted to those who have assisted my research for this paper. In particular, I wish to thank the staff at
Falkirk Archives, Falkirk Community Trust, Callendar House, for their excellent
service, which went far beyond the fetching of documents.
I would not have known of the collection of James Love
FEIS, FSA Scot., had it not been drawn to my attention by an Archivist who
spontaneously searched the catalogues for material relevant to my research. James Love wrote articles about Falkirk’s
life, institutions and people in The
Falkirk Herald from the late 1890s to the late 1920s, and he assembled
extremely valuable notes on the history of North Bantaskin, which are kept in
two envelopes in Falkirk Archives. I had
already written the main part of this paper when I discovered his notes, but
they filled a number of crucial gaps, and amply confirmed that my enquiry and
the emerging article were on the right lines.
The Love collection led me to John Rankine, the Falkirk merchant who
bought the Bantaskin estate in 1800, and to the vitally important bundle of
papers associated with that transaction, namely A1818.006, which provides
inventories of writs for previous owners as far back as the seventeenth
century.
I am very grateful indeed to Mrs Esther Harland (nee Fairlie) for passing on the photographs of the Wilson family and Bantaskin House, which have preserved such a fine visual record of a former mansion and its owners.
I am very grateful indeed to Mrs Esther Harland (nee Fairlie) for passing on the photographs of the Wilson family and Bantaskin House, which have preserved such a fine visual record of a former mansion and its owners.
I am also deeply indebted to Miss Linda Gowans, Sunderland, for tracing the on-line source for triennial returns for the British slave-owning estates of the Caribbean, and particularly for finding those for Belvedere in Elizabeth Hagart's time.
NOTE
ON SOURCES
This article owes a great deal to sources which are
very readily available on the internet, and accessible at a stroke or two of a
computer keyboard, thanks to the digital revolution in resource enhancement
over the last decade. Even newspapers
like the Falkirk Herald can be
accessed on line as a result of the fine work of the British Library. Basic information relating to all the
principal individuals in the discusssion can be accessed merely by typing their
names into the relevant sections of the outstanding facility Scotland’s People, for which I am most
profoundly grateful. Consequently, I do
not provide references for these ‘obvious’ sources. This helps to reduce the size of the
article.
I have, however, provided references and page numbers to
printed papers and journals, and to less accessible sources, such as academic
books and articles. Manuscript sources are listed in the usual way. I have also
provided references to little-known digital sources, and I have listed useful websites. Significant historical source-books, often out
of print, are sometimes available on-line, and several of these are listed.
It should be noted that Wills for the following
individuals are available through Scotland’s
People: Thomas C. Hagart (with
Inventory), Elizabeth Stewart Hagart (with Inventory), Charles Hagart, James
McCaul Hagart, Ann Hagart, Eliza Ellice (with Inventory), James Wilson, and Robert
Wilson (with Inventory).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
AND REFERENCES
Manuscripts
FA: Falkirk Archives, Falkirk Community Trust,
Callendar House
FA: A727.1230 (1), A727.1231 (8), Letters by T.C.
Hagart
FA: 1818.006, John Rankine, Title Deeds, Rentals, etc.
relating to Bantaskine
FA: A001.096/08, 09 James Love Papers
FA: EN 132/Wilson /7
Printed
sources
Brereton, Bridget, Race
Relations in Colonial Trinidad 1870-1900.
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1979.
Calatria,
Journal of the Falkirk Local History Society.
Cooke, Anthony, ‘An Elite Revisited: Glasgow West
India Merchants, 1783-1877’, Journal of
Scottish Historical Studies, 32.2 (2012), pp. 127-165.
Devine, T. M., Clearance
and Improvement: Land, Power and People in Scotland 1700-1900. John Donald: Edinburgh 2006.
Devine, T.M., ed., Recovering
Scotland’s Slavery Past: The Caribbean Connection. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh 2015.
Dobson, David, ed., Scots in the West Indies. 2 vols. Clearfield Company Inc.: Baltimore,
Maryland 1998-2006.
FH: The Falkirk
Herald.
Foot, M.R.D., ed., The
Gladstone Diaries 1825-1839. Oxford
University Press: Oxford 1968.
Glasgow
Street Directory 1867-68.
Hamilton, Douglas J., Scotland, the Caribbean and the Atlantic World 1750-1820. Manchester University Press: Manchester 2005.
Polland, Ron., ‘I
Will Build My Church:’ A History of Falkirk Baptist Church. Falkirk Baptist Church: Falkirk 1999.
Reid, John, The
Place Names of Falkirk and East Stirlingshire. Falkirk Local History
Society: Falkirk 2009.
Scott, Ian, The
Life and Times of Falkirk. John
Donald: Edinburgh 1994.
Seton, George, The
Law and Practice of Heraldry.
Edmonston and Douglas: Edinburgh
1863. Also available on-line.
Somerville, Thomas, George Square, Glasgow; and the Lives of Those whom its Statues
Commemorate. MacKinlay and
MacCallum: Glasgow 1891. Also available
on-line.
WEBSITES
Hagart brothers’ memorial, Camelon Cemetery, Falkirk, www.scottishwargraves.phpbbweb.com.scottishwargraves-ftopic267-375html
Hagart slaves: see Slave Records for Former British Colonial Dependencies 1813-34, http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/1129/CSUK1812
Hagart brothers’ military
service, www.britishempire.co.uk/forces/army
units/britishcavalry/7thhussarshagart.htm
Namier and Brooke, The History of Parliament: the
House of Commons 1754-1790, www.historyofparliamentonline.org
Statutes
of the Religious and Military Order of the Temple,
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ejQiAAAAMAAJ
Hi there. Marvellous stuff this. Thank you for sharing.
ReplyDeleteWould you mind if I use the image of Marion Wilson? Please make contact. All the best.
I am delighted that you have found this article useful, Rudy! Yes, of course - feel free to use the material. I have discovered further Wilson photographs in the family archive. I produce research of this kind so that it will be of benefit to others. It is particularly pleasant - but EXTREMELY rare - to receive an appreciative comment. Well over 1,000 readers or browsers have seen this article, but you have been the first to acknowledge its value. A great deal of effort goes into such projects, although they are the products of personal enthusiasm and curiosity. They don't simply 'grow' on blogs and websites. Every best wish for your research. Let me know if you need any further assistance in what is a very interesting field. Most gratefully, Donald.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the permission to use the image. How this connects to my research is:
ReplyDeleteJames Wilson built Trinidad Villas in Glasgow having lived in the West Indies. This house leant its name to the area, and later, a football pitch, called Trinidad Park was rented to a football club called Parkgrove. The money to rent the Park came from a young mixed-race gentleman, called Andrew Watson, the first black footballer to captain a national team and to play internationally. His Scottish father was a plantation owner in Guiana, and his mother was a local free woman of colour. In 1877 James Wilson, now Provost for Govan, became the President of the Parkgrove Football Club. I wanted to use the image of Marion Archer to support the theme of diversity in later 19th Century Victorian Glasgow. Thank you very much for your permission. It will appear in the forthcoming publication, Andrew Watson: A Straggling Life.
Rudy - My apologies for my slow response! My computer imploded in September, and I had to rebuild it! Then I knuckled down to completing a couple of books. So here I am again - just to say again, how delighted I am that my material was of use to you. Your discoveries about James Wilson do not surprise me in the least. His approach to 'diversity' was very different indeed from that of his predecessors on the Bantaskin estate!(!) Wilson's interest in football is fascinating too. All fascinating. Please keep me posted with regard to your publication. I look forward immensely to seeing it and reading it. Well done! Donald.
DeleteFascinating!
ReplyDeleteMy great grandfather James Campbell Beatson birthplace was listed as Bentaskine 31.10.1877
He came to South Africa in 1900 and built a house which he called Bentaskine.
Thank you! But which Bantaskine, I wonder? There were a few in Scotland, and two estates claiming the name in Falkirk itself. Can you tell us more! A very good New Year to you!
DeleteHello Donald, I was delighted to find your blog, whilst in the midst of searching for material on the Hagarts of Bantaskine, and I was struggling a bit with dates and ownership of North and South Bantaskine House. You have more than answered the questions I had. My interest is the history of Clan MacBean particularly in the Tomatin Sept- from whose inheriting lineage my family split off in the very early 1700s. I research family life and stories and write monologues for the family - I dont publish on line, but I do have a large family tree on Ancestry ‘Geddes Morrison” which covers the very extended families of the Tomatin MacBeans. Both the main MacBean septs were plantation owners, and I have found presences in Guyana, Jamaica, and St Eustatius over multiple generations. The Thomas Moore Adriana Heyliger marriage is very interesting. Adriana age 15 was offered as a bride to the elderly but very rich Charles Hagart on St Eustatius. She declined and eloped with Wm Thomas Moore. Her mother Elizabeth Molineux then became Mrs Charles Hagart! They had one child - Thomas Campbell Hagart who married Eliz Stewart. The Heyligers were the Dutch Colonial Governors and administrators on St Eustatius, known a sa the Golden Rock as it wa sa tax and tariff free island. So not only plantation profits but trade profits tax free on guns and canon, all manner of iron goods for the sugar industry etc. In the family of Lachlan Macbean 10th of Tomatin are middle forenames homages to the De Veer, Heyliger, de Clarencieux, Moore, Marteens - all long established Dutch West Indies families - and with links to Mennonite Anabaptists who fled Europe, Jewish families who has done the same, as well as Swedish and Dutch Royalty connections. So for a simple laddie fae the west highlands, its a very interesting reprise on all the history I never managed to study away back then. Thanks for putting this work together, I know exactly how difficult such research can be. In so far as you article would be most helpful to reference in my family tree work, I would respectfully ask to quote it within the family tree - no other publication. Adriana Moore managed to marry her daughters into the trading families of MacBean of Tomatin, McInroy of Lude, Semple of Liverpool and Hagart (cousin) of Torhouskie in the Machar of Wigtonshire. As was done back then, daughters were a ‘weapon;’ for social class and wealth advancement. All these families built on plantation and slave triangle shipping - sadly. With her mother marrying the daughters ‘intended', there came a huge falling out- and the two never meaningfully reconnected, became estranged, and Adriana was excluded completely from any inheritance of the Hagart fortune when Charles died in 1813 followed by Elizabeth in 1821. I’m at david.geddes@ymail.com if its easier to communicate with email. All best wishes on Tiree, lovely gem of a location- I’ve sailed there and out past frequently - David Geddes
ReplyDelete